Players gramz53 [STARR]    
626
626

WG player page
Updated: November 20, 2024 Update
Battles 30,343 30,343 30,343
WN8
626
626
626
Win Rate 48.861351876874% 48.86% 48.86%
Account Created: December 07, 2013 @ 12:44 am   |   Last Battle: April 12, 2020 @ 1:51 pm
 Clans History:
  

Tournament Statistics

Platournament: 5 Games: 0 Win Rate: 0.00%
Skirmishes: 13 Games: 241 Win Rate: 44.81%
Total: 18 Games: 241 Win Rate: 44.81%

Teams participated

Skirmish Team Performance Player WN8
Platournament 2.25.17
February 25, 2017
wish upon a STARR
1
0 / 0 (0%)
gramz53 [STARR]
592
Platournament 2.18.17
February 18, 2017
Reach for the STARRs
1
0 / 0 (0%)
gramz53 [STARR]
588
Platournament 2.11.17
February 11, 2017
team starr
1
0 / 0 (0%)
gramz53 [STARR]
587
Platournament 1.28.17
January 28, 2017
Team Starr
1
0 / 0 (0%)
gramz53 [STARR]
584
Platournament 1.21.17
January 21, 2017
Team Starr
1
0 / 0 (0%)
gramz53 [STARR]
583
SKIRMISH XIX
May 16, 2016
Team Starr
107
25 / 63 (40%)
gramz53 [STARR]
541
CASUAL - SKIRMISH IX
March 07, 2016
Team Starr
175
7 / 42 (17%)
gramz53 [STARR]
535
Skirmish VII
February 15, 2016
Team Starr
116
16 / 60 (27%)
gramz53 [STARR]
529
Skirmish V
February 01, 2016
Team Starr
46
33 / 60 (55%)
gramz53 [STARR]
522
Skirmish III
January 18, 2016
Oh My Starrs!
44
36 / 63 (57%)
gramz53 [STARR]
513
Skirmish 33
August 24, 2015
Team Starr
84
30 / 63 (48%)
gramz53 [STARR]
461
Skirmish 29
July 27, 2015
Team Starr
86
24 / 60 (40%)
gramz53 [STARR]
452
Skirmish 28
July 20, 2015
Team Starr
61
33 / 63 (52%)
gramz53 [STARR]
446
Skirmish 27
July 13, 2015
Team Starr
118
27 / 63 (43%)
gramz53 [STARR]
441
Skirmish 23
June 15, 2015
Team Starr
49
31 / 60 (52%)
gramz53 [STARR]
427
Skirmish 20: One Nation Army
May 25, 2015
Team Starr 1
122
34 / 63 (54%)
gramz53 [STARR]
415
Skirmish 19
May 18, 2015
Team Starr
0
0 / 0 (0%)
gramz53 [STARR]
408
Skirmish XVI: Tier 7
April 27, 2015
Team Starr 1
56
36 / 63 (57%)
gramz53 [STARR]
390

Let us know if you would like to see your banner here.
This is not an official WG website.
Any information presented here might not be 100% accurate.